Styles of Teaching: Banking Concept vs. Problem Posing Essay -- resea

Education is defined as, The act or address of educating or macrocosm educated, the knowledge or skill obtained or genuine by a scholarship process, a program of instruction of a specified kind or level, the field of study that is concerned with the instruction of apprizeing and learning, as well as an instructive or illuminating experience (No author). People begin their education from day one work the day they die. Ein truth day we learn new things in diverse representations. Whether someone is just telling us some random feature or you are sitting in a classroom being lectured by a professor. The main focus of this classical argument involves the learning that is done in the classroom or lecture hall in the schools of America today. The question arose as to which style of teaching is around good in sparking the minds of the receivers to make them become transformers of their education? Would the banking concept of teaching be more effective, where the scope of the a ction allowed to the scholarly persons extends besides as far as receiving, filing, and storing the deposits (pg. 260). Or would the chore posing style of teaching be the most effective, where by responding to the essence of consciousnessintentionallyrejects communiqus and embodies communications. It epitomizes the special peculiar(prenominal) of consciousness (pg. 265). In this essay I intend persuade you the audience to take in my experiences and the experience of two other authors, whom I leave behind be showing you later, and take a look from my point of view. with this essay I am going to try and show the advantages of problem posing style to education. In my opinion this style of education is very effective in expanding the minds of the receiver by making them more interactional in their learning rather than the distinctive lecture and take notes. In this style of education people teach each other and the teacher is not the except one edify the class with their knowle dge. I cannot only speak this opinion from my have got experiences, precisely also others who share in the same view sculpted by their experiences. The two authors whom I use for a base of my point of view are Paulo Freire and Richard Rodriguez. Freire wrote the essay called The Banking innovation of Education, in which Freire shows how problem posing education is the most effective way to teach and be taught at the same time. Rodriguez wrote the essay call... ... all, everyone is different in their own respective way and some people might suck in the ability to simply comprehend all they hear, unlike myself I face like I teach myself more on my own or with others than if I were sitting down and taking notes. The only problem with just listening during a lecture is that people dont throw all that information over a long period of time. approximately of the information is stored in the brain until that test comes and all the information leaves when you put across in the test .In conclusion the problem-posing style to education is not only the most effective way in helping a student retain the information, but it also sets everyone, whether it be the teacher or the students, at equilibrium. I am not just speaking from my point of view, but also from Freire. We both came to the same conclusion and based our opinions off our own experiences. This style of education is very effective in expanding the minds of the receiver by making them more interactive in their learning rather than the typical lecture and take notes. In this style of education people teach each other and the teacher is not the only one enlightening the class with their knowledge.